Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Home Care After Cancer in Mohali
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia After Head-and-Neck Cancer Treatment in Mohali
A detailed clinical documentation of how a 67-year-old Mohali resident with swallowing difficulties following head-and-neck cancer treatment received structured home-based swallowing rehabilitation, nutritional support, and multidisciplinary care to regain mealtime safety and functional independence.
Table of Contents
Patient Background
Mr. Raghav Mehta was a 67-year-old retired postal department supervisor living with his wife, Mrs. Sunita Mehta, in Mohali, Punjab. Before his illness, he was fully independent in all activities of daily living. He managed his eating, walking, personal care, and household responsibilities without any assistance.
His son, Arjun Mehta, lived separately but remained actively involved in his parents’ lives, particularly after his father’s cancer diagnosis. The family dynamic meant that Mrs. Mehta served as the primary caregiver during the day, while Arjun provided additional support during evenings and weekends.
Mr. Mehta was diagnosed with head-and-neck cancer and underwent cancer-directed treatment. The treatment was completed, but it left him with a significant residual problem: difficulty swallowing. What began as mild trouble with solid foods gradually worsened. He started coughing during meals, and his food intake reduced considerably. Over the months surrounding his treatment, he lost weight and developed generalized weakness.
His treating medical team recognized that his swallowing difficulty required formal assessment and rehabilitation. He was referred for a swallowing evaluation, which eventually led to his hospital admission for comprehensive management.
| Name | Mr. Raghav Mehta (Fictional) |
| Age | 67 years |
| Gender | Male |
| City | Mohali, Punjab |
| Occupation | Retired Postal Department Supervisor |
| Marital Status | Married |
| Primary Caregiver | Wife, Mrs. Sunita Mehta |
| Secondary Caregiver | Son, Arjun Mehta |
| Pre-illness Function | Fully independent in all ADLs |
Associated Medical Conditions
Beyond his primary swallowing diagnosis, Mr. Mehta had a few associated conditions that influenced his care plan:
- Hypertension: His blood pressure was controlled with prescribed medication. This was a stable, pre-existing condition that required ongoing medication adherence but did not directly complicate his swallowing rehabilitation.
- Treatment-Related Dry Mouth: After cancer treatment, he experienced significantly reduced saliva production and a persistent dry-mouth sensation. This contributed to difficulty forming a food bolus and made swallowing uncomfortable.
- Mild Weight Loss: His weight had decreased during the months surrounding cancer treatment because eating had become progressively more difficult. This weight loss was not severe at the time of home care initiation but required close monitoring to prevent further decline.
Clinical Diagnosis
Mr. Mehta’s primary diagnosis was oropharyngeal dysphagia after head-and-neck cancer treatment. Oropharyngeal dysphagia refers to difficulty moving food or liquid safely from the mouth through the throat during the swallowing process.
After head-and-neck cancer treatment, swallowing difficulties can develop because the treatment may affect multiple structures and functions involved in swallowing. These include tongue movement, jaw mobility, throat muscle function, saliva production, sensation in the mouth and throat, and the coordination of the complex swallowing sequence.
Mr. Mehta’s main problem was difficulty swallowing certain textures safely and efficiently. He could manage some food consistencies better than others, but dry and mixed-texture foods were particularly challenging.
Swallowing is a complex neuromuscular process. When a person eats, food must be chewed, formed into a bolus, moved to the back of the mouth, and then transported through the throat into the esophagus, all while the airway is protected. Cancer treatment can disrupt one or more of these steps. The muscles may become fibrotic or weak. Sensation may be reduced, meaning the patient does not feel food remaining in the mouth or entering the airway. Saliva may be insufficient to help form the bolus. Each of these changes can make swallowing slower, less efficient, and less safe.
Presenting Condition After Discharge
At the first home assessment, Mr. Mehta was alert and able to communicate clearly. His cognitive function was intact. However, meals took significantly longer than they had before treatment, and he experienced multiple distressing symptoms:
Despite these difficulties, he was able to take food orally according to the texture recommended by his swallowing-care team. This was an important starting point because it meant his rehabilitation could focus on optimizing oral intake rather than transitioning from alternative feeding.
Initial Clinical Assessment
| Clinical Parameter | Finding |
|---|---|
| Blood Pressure | 122/74 mmHg |
| Heart Rate | 80 beats/min |
| Respiratory Rate | 17 breaths/min |
| Temperature | 98.3°F |
| Oxygen Saturation | 97% on room air |
All vital parameters were within acceptable ranges at the initial assessment. The nurse also observed Mr. Mehta during routine oral intake according to his established swallowing plan, monitoring specifically for coughing, wet or gurgly voice quality, throat clearing, fatigue, difficulty managing saliva, and any changes in breathing after meals.
Swallowing Assessment Details
A speech-language pathologist reviewed multiple components of his swallowing function:
- Oral motor function, including tongue movement range and strength
- Lip closure during feeding
- Jaw movement and ability to chew
- Ability to control food within the oral cavity
- Swallow timing and coordination
- Cough strength (important for clearing aspirated material)
- Voice quality after swallowing (a wet voice can indicate aspiration)
- Ability to manage different food textures safely
The assessment confirmed that Mr. Mehta had more difficulty with dry and mixed-texture foods. He was able to manage the prescribed texture more safely when sitting upright and following the recommended swallowing strategies. This information directly shaped his home care plan.
Nutritional Assessment
The healthcare team monitored several nutritional parameters:
- Body weight trends over time
- Actual meal intake compared to recommended intake
- Fluid intake volume
- Meal duration (prolonged meals can reduce total intake)
- Appetite levels
- Signs of dehydration (dry mucous membranes, reduced urine output, skin turgor)
- Difficulty consuming adequate calories to maintain weight
Mrs. Mehta maintained a simple daily food and fluid record, which the nurse reviewed during each visit. This record became an important tool for tracking progress and identifying problems early.
Functional Assessment
- Meal preparation
- Food texture modification
- Grocery shopping
- Medication organization
- Longer outdoor activities
- Communication
- Decision-making
- Grooming
- Toileting
- Indoor walking
- Feeding with prescribed strategies
Mobility Status at Start of Home Care
- Walked independently indoors without assistance
- Used a walking stick when going outdoors
- Could walk approximately 100 metres before needing to rest
- Required additional time for stairs
- Became tired after prolonged activities
His weakness was partly related to reduced nutritional intake during the months of difficult eating and partly related to the physical toll of prolonged cancer treatment. This was an important consideration when planning his physiotherapy component.
Hospital Treatment
Mr. Mehta was admitted to the hospital after developing increasing difficulty swallowing, coughing during meals, reduced food intake, weight loss, and general weakness. There was also clinical concern for aspiration, which is when food or liquid enters the airway instead of the esophagus.
He remained hospitalized for 9 days. During this period, his care included:
- Comprehensive medical assessment by the treating physician and specialist team
- Formal swallowing evaluation by a speech-language pathologist
- Nutritional assessment to determine his caloric and fluid needs
- Speech and swallowing therapy sessions to begin rehabilitation
- Medication review to ensure all prescriptions were appropriate and safe for his swallowing ability
- Hydration support to address any deficit from reduced oral intake
- Monitoring for respiratory complications, particularly signs of aspiration pneumonia
Before discharge, his swallowing plan was adjusted based on the assessment findings. A specific food texture and set of swallowing strategies were recommended. The team confirmed he could manage oral intake safely with these modifications before authorizing discharge.
Hospitalization allowed the team to conduct a formal swallowing assessment in a controlled setting, rule out aspiration pneumonia through clinical and possibly radiological evaluation, stabilize his nutritional and hydration status, initiate swallowing rehabilitation under direct supervision, and establish a safe feeding plan before sending him home. Discharging without this structured assessment would have left him at significant risk of aspiration and further weight loss.
Why Home Healthcare Was Recommended
After discharge, Mr. Mehta continued to require multiple forms of support that went beyond what his family could safely provide on their own. The hospital team recommended home healthcare for several specific reasons:
Safe eating supervision: Although Mr. Mehta could feed himself, he needed someone knowledgeable about dysphagia to observe his meals, ensure correct positioning, and recognize early signs of aspiration. His wife could provide some of this supervision, but she needed professional guidance and periodic verification that her observations were accurate.
Swallowing exercise compliance: The speech-language pathologist prescribed specific exercises that needed to be performed regularly. Without professional oversight, exercise compliance tends to decline, and incorrect technique can reduce effectiveness or cause discomfort.
Nutrition and hydration monitoring: His weight, intake, and hydration status needed to be tracked systematically. A nurse could identify trends that a family member might miss, such as a gradual reduction in fluid intake over several days.
Medication administration: Some medications required specific instructions related to his swallowing ability. The family needed to understand which medications could be crushed, which needed to be taken with food, and which required particular fluid volumes for safe swallowing.
Monitoring for aspiration symptoms: Aspiration can be silent, meaning the patient does not cough even when material enters the airway. A trained nurse could monitor for subtle signs such as voice changes, temperature elevation, or increased respiratory rate that might indicate a developing problem.
Family education: Mrs. Mehta and Arjun needed structured education on safe mealtime practices, warning signs, oral hygiene, and when to seek urgent medical attention. This education was most effective when delivered in their own home environment where the strategies would actually be applied.
By the time of discharge, Mr. Mehta was medically stable. His vitals were normal. He did not have an active infection. He could manage oral intake with the prescribed modifications. Keeping him in the hospital longer would have exposed him to hospital-acquired infections, disrupted his sleep and daily routine, and added emotional stress without clear medical benefit. Home healthcare allowed his rehabilitation to continue in a familiar environment where he could practice real-life mealtime situations with professional support available.
Families in the Delhi NCR region, including those in nearby areas like Mohali, increasingly opt for home nursing services after hospital discharge for precisely this reason. The patient recovers in comfortable surroundings while still receiving clinical oversight. For patients with specific needs like difficulty swallowing and feeding support, this model is particularly effective because meals happen in the actual home setting where strategies must work in practice.
Home Care Plan by AtHomeCare
Mr. Mehta’s home care plan was multidisciplinary. It involved a nurse, a patient attendant, a speech-language pathologist, a physiotherapist, and a visiting doctor. Each team member had clearly defined responsibilities that complemented the others.
Home Nursing
The home nurse played a central coordinating role. During each visit, the nurse monitored:
- Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation)
- Weight, recorded at regular intervals to detect trends
- Hydration status, including oral fluid intake and signs of dehydration
- Food intake, cross-referenced with the family’s daily record
- Medication adherence, ensuring all prescriptions were taken correctly and on time
- Coughing during and after meals, noting frequency and severity
- Respiratory symptoms, watching for any signs suggesting chest infection
- Oral hygiene practices, reinforcing the importance of regular mouth care
- General weakness and energy levels
The nurse also reinforced the swallowing instructions provided by the treating hospital team. This reinforcement was critical because patients and families often forget or inadvertently modify instructions over time. The nurse ensured consistency between what the hospital recommended and what was actually happening at home.
Patient Attendant
A trained patient attendant was assigned to assist with practical daily tasks that Mrs. Mehta found difficult to manage alone. The attendant’s role included:
- Meal preparation under the guidance of the established texture recommendations
- Preparing appropriate food textures (such as pureed, minced, or moistened consistencies as prescribed)
- Sitting nearby during meals when supervision was required
- Kitchen activities, including cleaning and organizing
- Shopping for groceries and supplies
- Other household activities that supported Mr. Mehta’s care routine
The attendant was explicitly instructed not to independently change food consistency or swallowing techniques. Any adjustments to food texture, portion size, meal pacing, or feeding position were to be made only by the speech-language pathologist or based on documented recommendations from the swallowing specialist. This boundary was important because improvised changes, even well-intentioned ones, can increase aspiration risk.
Swallowing Rehabilitation
A speech-language pathologist guided the rehabilitation program. The treatment goals were clearly defined from the start:
Swallowing Rehabilitation Goals
- Improve swallowing safety by reducing the risk of aspiration
- Improve oral control, including tongue movement and lip seal
- Reduce swallowing-related fatigue through technique optimization
- Maintain adequate nutrition and hydration through oral intake
- Improve confidence during meals, reducing fear and anxiety
- Reduce avoidable aspiration risk through consistent strategy use
Depending on his assessment at each session, rehabilitation activities included:
- Oral motor exercises: Targeted movements to improve the strength and coordination of the lips, tongue, and jaw
- Tongue-movement exercises: Specific exercises to improve tongue range of motion, strength, and control during the oral phase of swallowing
- Lip exercises: Exercises to improve lip closure, which helps prevent food from falling out of the mouth during chewing
- Controlled swallowing practice: Practicing swallowing with small volumes of the prescribed texture, focusing on technique
- Safe swallowing strategies: Techniques such as chin tuck, multiple swallows, or specific postures recommended by the assessing clinician
- Breathing and cough coordination: Exercises to improve the ability to cough effectively if material enters the airway
- Mealtime positioning: Ensuring optimal upright posture during and after meals
Exercises were adjusted according to his response and ongoing swallowing assessment. The speech-language pathologist did not follow a rigid protocol but modified the program based on what was working and what needed adjustment.
Physiotherapy
Gentle physiotherapy at home was included to address Mr. Mehta’s general weakness. His reduced walking tolerance and fatigue during daily activities were partly related to deconditioning from reduced nutrition and the physical demands of cancer treatment.
The physiotherapy program included:
- Sit-to-stand practice: Repeated practice of standing up from a chair to improve lower-limb strength and functional mobility
- Lower-limb strengthening: Gentle exercises targeting the quadriceps, gluteals, and other muscles important for walking
- Balance exercises: Activities to improve balance and reduce fall risk, particularly important given his use of a walking stick outdoors
- Short-distance walking: Gradually increasing walking distance within his tolerance
- Activity pacing: Teaching Mr. Mehta how to balance activity and rest to avoid excessive fatigue
The goal was to improve overall functional endurance without causing excessive fatigue that might interfere with his swallowing rehabilitation or nutritional intake. The physiotherapist coordinated with the nurse and speech-language pathologist to ensure that physical activity did not come at the cost of mealtime energy.
Doctor Home Visit
A doctor home visit was scheduled at regular intervals. The medical review focused on:
- Nutritional status and weight changes
- Medication tolerance and any side effects
- Swallowing-related concerns reported by the patient, family, or nursing team
- Respiratory symptoms that might suggest aspiration or infection
- Cancer follow-up needs and coordination with the oncology team
- General recovery trajectory
Any new or worsening swallowing problem was referred to the appropriate specialist. The home doctor served as a bridge between the home care team and the hospital specialists.
Equipment Used at Home
The home setup included standard monitoring and safety equipment:
| Equipment | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Pulse Oximeter | Monitor oxygen saturation, especially if respiratory symptoms developed |
| Digital BP Monitor | Regular blood pressure monitoring for hypertension management |
| Digital Thermometer | Daily temperature checks to detect early infection |
| Stable Dining Chair with Back Support | Ensure upright posture during meals for safer swallowing |
| Adjustable Table | Allow proper positioning of food and utensils at appropriate height |
| Handheld Oral-Care Supplies | Regular oral hygiene to reduce aspiration-related infection risk |
| Walking Stick | Safe ambulation outdoors |
Specialized feeding equipment such as thickened liquids or special utensils was not required because Mr. Mehta continued oral feeding under his established swallowing plan. The medical equipment used was standard and readily available.
Daily Care Plan
A structured daily routine was established to provide consistency. Consistency is particularly important in dysphagia rehabilitation because variable mealtime practices can make it difficult to assess whether the swallowing plan is working.
- Oral hygiene upon waking
- Prescribed medication taken with appropriate fluid
- Hydration according to his swallowing plan (not plain water if a different consistency was prescribed)
- Breakfast using the recommended food consistency
- Slow, supervised eating when needed
- Rest period after breakfast
- Short indoor walk with walking stick nearby if needed
Family check: Mrs. Mehta observed whether Mr. Mehta experienced coughing or unusual throat discomfort during breakfast and reported this to the nurse.
- Lunch with the prescribed food texture and consistency
- Swallowing exercises when scheduled by the speech-language pathologist
- Rest period
- Physiotherapy session (timed to avoid mealtime fatigue)
- Hydration at recommended intervals
- Afternoon medication
- Light activity as tolerated
Key point: Meals were not rushed. Sufficient time was allowed between bites and sips according to his swallowing plan.
- Short walk (distance as tolerated, gradually increasing)
- Swallowing practice as prescribed
- Dinner using the recommended food consistency
- Evening medication
- Oral hygiene after dinner
- Review of the day’s food and fluid intake with the family
- Oral hygiene completed before bedtime
- Prescribed night medication checked and administered
- Family reviewed the day’s food and fluid intake record
- Any coughing or breathing symptoms after meals were recorded
- Pathway to the bathroom kept clear to prevent falls during night-time visits
Risks Being Monitored
The home healthcare team maintained ongoing vigilance for several serious risks. Each risk was monitored through specific observations and assessments:
Not all aspiration produces coughing. In some patients, material enters the airway without triggering a cough reflex, particularly when sensation is reduced after cancer treatment. This is called silent aspiration. The nursing team monitored for indirect signs such as voice quality changes after meals, unexplained low-grade fever, increased respiratory rate, or worsening fatigue, which might indicate silent aspiration even in the absence of overt coughing. Families caring for patients with aspiration risk should understand that the absence of coughing does not guarantee safe swallowing.
Home Care Goals
Short-Term Goals
- Improve swallowing safety during meals
- Maintain adequate nutritional intake
- Prevent dehydration
- Reduce mealtime anxiety and fear of choking
- Establish consistent oral-care habits
- Improve family understanding of dysphagia management
Long-Term Goals
- Maintain safe oral intake long-term
- Improve functional swallowing ability where possible
- Maintain stable body weight
- Reduce avoidable aspiration complications
- Improve general strength and endurance
- Support independence during meals
- Continue appropriate cancer follow-up
Family Education
Family education was a core component of the home care plan. Mrs. Mehta and Arjun received structured training on several critical topics. This education was delivered verbally, demonstrated in practice, and reinforced over multiple visits.
Mr. Mehta was encouraged to remain upright during meals and follow the specific positioning instructions given by his swallowing specialist. The family avoided feeding him while he was lying down or reclining, even during rest periods. His dining chair had back support, and the table was adjusted to an appropriate height. After meals, he remained upright for at least 20 to 30 minutes to reduce the risk of reflux and late aspiration.
Mrs. Mehta was taught not to rush him. This was a significant adjustment because, before his illness, meals had been quick and routine. Now, meals were divided into manageable portions, with sufficient time between bites and sips according to his swallowing plan. The attendant was instructed to prepare smaller portions that could be offered gradually rather than placing a large plate of food in front of him.
The family was trained to watch for specific warning signs during and after meals:
- Coughing during or after meals
- Wet or gurgly voice quality after swallowing
- Repeated throat clearing that is not related to a cold or allergy
- Breathing changes after eating, such as faster or shallower breathing
- Fever, which could indicate an emerging infection
- Increased chest congestion or coughing that worsens over hours or days
Persistent or worsening symptoms were to be reported to the healthcare team promptly. The family was given clear contact information and instructed on what constituted an urgent versus routine report.
Good oral hygiene was emphasized as an essential part of dysphagia management. When a person aspirates, the material that enters the lungs includes whatever bacteria are present in the mouth. If oral hygiene is poor, the aspirated material carries a higher bacterial load, increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Mr. Mehta performed oral care regularly, with assistance from the attendant when he was fatigued. This included brushing, cleaning the tongue, and using recommended mouth care products. The importance of oral hygiene in patients with aspiration risk cannot be overstated.
The family followed the recommended diet rather than making random changes to food consistency. This was a critical instruction because families sometimes decide on their own to thicken or thin foods based on what seems easier, which can actually increase risk. They monitored daily intake, weight, hydration, meal duration, and appetite. A dietitian was involved when additional nutritional support was needed. The family was also educated about the importance of nutrition and hydration in elderly care and how even small shortfalls in daily intake can accumulate into significant problems over weeks.
Medications were administered according to the prescribed instructions. The family was specifically instructed not to crush tablets or alter medication formulations without confirming that doing so was safe with the prescribing doctor or pharmacist. Some medications are extended-release or enteric-coated, and crushing them can change how the drug is absorbed, potentially causing harm. The nurse reviewed all medications at each visit as part of ongoing medication management.
Recovery Timeline
The home care team conducted a comprehensive initial assessment. Vital signs were recorded and found to be stable. The nurse observed Mr. Mehta during a meal, noting his positioning, eating pace, coughing frequency, and voice quality after swallowing. The speech-language pathologist reviewed his hospital swallowing assessment report and observed his current oral motor function. The physiotherapist assessed his mobility, walking tolerance, and strength. The daily care plan was established, and the family received initial education on mealtime safety.
The daily routine began to settle into a pattern. The attendant was preparing meals with the correct texture consistency. Mrs. Mehta was maintaining the food and fluid record. Mr. Mehta completed his first formal swallowing exercise session with the speech-language pathologist. The nurse noted that he required reminders about posture during meals but was generally cooperative. His first physiotherapy session focused on assessment and gentle sit-to-stand practice.
By the end of the first week, the family was becoming more familiar with the routine. Mr. Mehta was performing swallowing exercises regularly, though he reported some fatigue during sessions. His food intake remained below optimal but was consistent. The nurse observed occasional coughing during meals but no signs of respiratory distress. Weight was recorded as stable compared to the discharge weight. The doctor conducted the first home visit and reviewed the overall plan, finding it appropriate. The family asked several questions about food texture, which were addressed by the nurse and speech-language pathologist.
Exercise compliance improved. Mr. Mehta was more familiar with the swallowing techniques and needed fewer reminders about posture and pacing. The physiotherapist noted slight improvement in sit-to-stand ability. Meal duration remained prolonged but was becoming more predictable. The nurse observed that Mrs. Mehta was becoming more confident in her role as mealtime supervisor. No new symptoms were reported. The food and fluid record showed consistent intake.
At the one-month mark, the speech-language pathologist noted improved oral control during exercises. Mr. Mehta was more consistent with his swallowing strategies during actual meals. His walking tolerance had increased slightly. The doctor reviewed his weight and found it stable. The family reported that meals felt less stressful than they had at the beginning of home care. Coughing during meals was still present but less frequent. The care plan was continued without major changes, though exercise complexity was slightly increased based on his progress.
Mr. Mehta became more consistent with his swallowing strategies without requiring frequent reminders. He could complete meals with fewer interruptions and remained on the prescribed oral diet. His walking distance increased to approximately 120 metres. The nurse noted that his energy levels appeared improved. The family reported less anxiety around mealtimes. This was a meaningful turning point because it indicated that the strategies were becoming habitual rather than requiring conscious effort.
His family reported fewer coughing episodes during meals. He continued to require additional time for eating but was more confident during meals. His weight stabilized compared with the initial home assessment. The doctor noted no respiratory concerns. The physiotherapist increased the walking distance target. The speech-language pathologist continued therapy but noted that progress was gradual and within expected limits for post-cancer dysphagia rehabilitation.
Mr. Mehta could complete most meals independently while following the recommended swallowing strategies. He no longer needed someone sitting beside him throughout every meal, though the family continued to be present and observant. His walking tolerance increased to approximately 145 metres. He continued regular swallowing therapy. The nurse noted that his oral hygiene was consistently good. The family’s daily record showed adequate caloric intake.
At the formal 12-week assessment, the following was documented:
- Weight remained stable with no further decline
- Meal-related coughing was less frequent
- He remained independently mobile indoors
- Walking tolerance reached approximately 165 metres
- He continued to require a modified food texture for selected foods
- He remained under cancer and swallowing follow-up with his hospital specialists
The rehabilitation goal was not to promise complete recovery of swallowing function. Post-treatment dysphagia often persists to some degree. The goal was to support safe nutrition, functional independence, and quality of life. By this standard, the 12-week outcome represented meaningful progress. Mr. Mehta was eating safely, maintaining his weight, and participating in family meals with less fear and less coughing. He still required modified textures for some foods, and he still needed more time than before his illness, but he was functioning well within his adjusted capabilities.
Clinical Evidence
The following tables summarize the clinical parameters documented during Mr. Mehta’s home care period. All values are drawn from the documented assessments described in this case study.
Vital Signs at Initial Home Assessment
| Parameter | Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Pressure | 122/74 mmHg | Within normal range; hypertension controlled |
| Heart Rate | 80 beats/min | Normal |
| Respiratory Rate | 17 breaths/min | Normal; no respiratory distress |
| Temperature | 98.3°F | Afebrile; no sign of infection |
| SpO2 | 97% on room air | Normal |
Walking Tolerance Progression
| Time Point | Walking Distance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Start of Home Care | Approx. 100 metres | Required rest; used walking stick outdoors |
| Week 6 | Approx. 120 metres | Gradual improvement with physiotherapy |
| Week 10 | Approx. 145 metres | Improved endurance; less fatigue |
| Week 12 | Approx. 165 metres | Continued upward trend |
Functional Status Summary
| Domain | Start of Care | Week 12 |
|---|---|---|
| Oral Intake | Prescribed texture, prolonged meals, frequent coughing | Prescribed texture, fewer interruptions, less coughing |
| Weight | Mild weight loss documented | Stable |
| Indoor Mobility | Independent with walking stick available | Independent, improved tolerance |
| Mealtime Independence | Required supervision during meals | Mostly independent with strategies |
| Exercise Compliance | Starting phase | Consistent with exercises |
| Confidence | Fear of choking, anxious at meals | More confident, less anxious |
| Family Confidence | Uncertain about managing dysphagia | More knowledgeable and confident |